Florent Bax vs Reda Bennani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Aug at 12:18 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Bax vs R. Bennani

 FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bax 1 - 0 Bennani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Florent Bax winning 2 and Reda Bennani winning 0. The last match between Florent Bax and Reda Bennani was at the M25 Brazzaville, 09-08-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Florent Bax getting the victory 6-3 1-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Bax | 1 | 
| Bennani | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) M25 Brazzaville(08-09-25)
F. Bax vs R. Bennani H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,020 | 
| 62.03% (245-150) | Career Total W/L | 58.62% (34-24) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 5 | Titles | 1 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
F. Bax vs R. Bennani Match Preview:
- How do Bennani and Bax compare in their second serve performance over the past six months? Both players have won 44.2% of points on second serves.
 - What about their return game performance? Bennani shows stronger return stats, winning 45.77% of opponents' second serve points compared to Bax's 43.79%.
 - In terms of first serve returns, Bennani outperforms Bax significantly, winning 35.39% versus Bax's 23.07%.
 - Under pressure, by saving breakpoints, Bennani also holds an edge by saving 57.53% compared to Bax's 54.73%.
 - Analyzing overall performance in the past year, Bennani boasts a 71.88% match win rate, whereas Bax has a slightly lower rate at 66.67%.
 - On surface preferences, Bennani excels on Hard courts (67% win rate), while Bax performs best on Clay (64% win rate).
 - How do their playing levels compare on the tour? While Bennani and Bax have both predominantly played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Bax has a higher win rate at 76.6% compared to Bennani’s 71.88%.
 - Bennani's opponents had an average rank of 426.56 over the last year, compared to Bax whose opponents averaged a rank of 369.18.
 - If the match reaches a deciding set, Bennani is more likely to prevail, winning 63% of such sets, while Bax has won 47%.
 - How do they fare in breakpoint conversion? Bennani converts 35.67% of opportunities, surpassing Bax who converts 29.08%.
 
Editorial Prediction (August 9, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the head-to-head statistics, Bennani demonstrates a stronger second serve return performance and a higher breakpoint conversion rate. These factors, alongside their greater success rate in deciding sets, suggest an edge against Bax.
Bennani's consistent ability to handle pressure, as reflected in their advantage in saving breakpoints, positions them favorably in clutch situations. Furthermore, Bennani's proficiency on Hard courts indicates a potential advantage, depending on the match surface.
While Bax has faced slightly stronger opponents, Bennani's overall statistics paint them as a more strategic and resilient player. Based on these facts, Bennani is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Florent Bax vs Reda Bennani Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Bax vs R. Bennani H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 7 | Games Won | 3 | 
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 0:58:36 | Average Match Time | 0:58:36 | 
| 57% (25/44) | 1st Serve % | 73% (19/26) | 
| 60% (15/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) | 
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3/7) | 
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) | 
| 58% (15/26) | Return Points Win % | 39% (17/44) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
F. Bax Recent Matches Played
R. Bennani Recent Matches Played

F. Bax vs R. Bennani Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.03% (245/150) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.62% (34/24) | 
| 60.07% (534/355) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.02% (76/55) | 
| 54.22% (4455/3761) | Games Win/Loss | 51.19% (622/593) | 
| 62.39% (73/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) | 
| 64.98% (167/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.69% (30/22) | 
| 23.81% (5/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 
| 1244 | Aces Total | 56 | 
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 
| 771 | Total Double Faults | 93 | 
| 1:29:12 | Average Match Time | 1:50:26 | 
| 403.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.69 | 
| 59% (13219/22291) | 1st Serve % | 71% (2749/3882) | 
| 69% (9156/13219) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1654/2749) | 
| 51% (4649/9074) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (579/1133) | 
| 42% (972/2338) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (201/450) | 
| 40% (8933/22059) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1701/3954) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) | 
| 48.89% (22/23) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 63.71% (223/127) | Futures W/L | 61.11% (33/21) | 
| 62% (238/385) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (32/56) | 
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 55% (51/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 82% (14/17) | 
| 52% (53/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (6/15) | 
| 88% (246/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (34/31) | 
| 12% (246/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (34/3) | 
| 18% (148/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (24/3) |